methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of DIBB with its method-specific working model.
Product Strategy
DIBB
Paper illustration of HEART Framework with its method-specific working model.
UX Research
HEART Framework
Paper illustration of a Test Card with four fields for hypothesis, test, metric, and success threshold.
Product Discovery
Test Card
Paper illustration of Counter Metrics with its method-specific working model.
Product Strategy
Counter Metrics
Purposedifferent
DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report.Helps clarify observations, needs, and patterns in concrete terms. It groups observations into patterns, questions, and decisions. The result is captured as a HEART-GSM table and dashboard.The Test Card turns a critical assumption into a testable claim and specifies in advance which result counts as success.When a headline metric could mask side effects, it adds guardrail signals against unwanted outcomes. It connects customer value, product logic, and decision priorities. The result is captured as a counter-metric list and guardrail definitions.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumLowLow
Timedifferent
1-2 h120 min initial, dann laufend20-35 min30-60 min
Participantsdifferent
2-83-61-52-6
Formatsame
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
DIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning reportHEART-GSM Table, DashboardTest Card with a pre-set thresholdCounter Metric List, Guardrail Definitions
Tagsno overlap
StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis
MetricsUX researchMeasurementSatisfaction
ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryHypothesis
MetricsMeasurementStrategyExperiments
Add more methods