methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of DIBB with its method-specific working model.
Product Strategy
DIBB
Growth Experiment workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Growth
Growth Experiment
Paper illustration of the Force Field Analysis working structure.
Decision Making
Force Field Analysis
Paper illustration of a two-by-two Ansoff Matrix with four growth directions
Business Strategy
Ansoff Matrix
Purposedifferent
DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report.When growth ideas surface quickly, the temptation to build immediately instead of learning is high. A Growth Experiment frames an assumption so target group, lever, and measurement are clear before the first deployment.In change initiatives, supporting and restraining forces sit at the table at the same time. Force Field Analysis makes these tensions explicit and shows where change can be pushed forward by strengthening or relieving.The Ansoff Matrix organizes growth options by market and product relation. It helps weigh expansion, diversification, and adaptation cleanly against each other.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumLowLow
Timedifferent
1-2 h1-2 Wochen45-90 min45-90 min
Participantsdifferent
2-81-63-122-8
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
DIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning reportExperiment card, Result summary, Next betForce Field Map, Change Levers, Risk NotesAnsoff Matrix, Growth Options, Risk Notes
Tagsno overlap
StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis
MarketingGrowthExperimentsLearning
ChangeDecisionStrategy
GrowthStrategyMarketPortfolio
Add more methods