View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Strategy DIBB | ![]() Decision Making Decision Framing Workshop | ![]() Facilitation Six Thinking Hats | ![]() Decision Making Option Framing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report. | When a decision is poorly framed, even good answers deliver little value. A Decision Framing Workshop sharpens the problem, goal, and boundaries before the actual weighing begins. | When a topic gets stuck too quickly in the same thinking mode, Six Thinking Hats deliberately separates the perspectives. This means facts, risks, creativity, and emotional signals get worked through one after another instead of mixed together. | In early decisions, alternatives are often still vague, incomplete, or blended together. Option Framing brings every possibility into a comparable form and makes visible which variant actually fits the question. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | 60-120 min | 45-90 min | 45-120 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 4-10 | 4-12 | 3-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | DIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning report | Decision Frame, Decision Question, Criteria List, Evidence Plan | Perspective Notes, Decision Inputs, Action Items | Option Frames, Assumption Notes, Comparable Shortlist, Decision Inputs |
Tagsno overlap | StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis | Decision framingAlignmentCriteriaOptions | FacilitationOptionsDecision | OptionsDecision framingStrategyComparison |



