View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Strategy DIBB |  Architecture Architecture Inception Canvas |  Architecture Request for Comments |  Product Strategy Product Vision Board |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report. | The Architecture Inception Canvas bundles the first architecture questions into a compact decision picture. It fits when an initiative is still in motion but still needs clear guardrails. | An RFC clarifies architecture context, options, and consequences. It structures technical context, alternatives, tradeoffs, open questions, and review feedback, and captures the result as an RFC document, reviewer comments, and a decision rationale. | When a product needs a shared direction, it connects target audience, benefit, and business picture in a clear vision. It makes the envisioned future legible for the team. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | 1-2 h | 1-3 Wochen vom Draft bis zur Entscheidung | 1-2 h |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 3-8 | 3-20 Reviewer | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | DIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning report | Inception Canvas, Risks, Goal List, Open Questions | RFC document, Reviewer comments, Decision rationale, Follow-up ADR or tickets | Product Vision Board, Vision Statement, Assumptions and Validation Questions |
Tagsno overlap | StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis | AlignmentArchitectureCanvas | ArchitectureDecisionAsyncGovernance | VisionCanvasStrategyAlignment |