methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Diary Study.
UX Research
Diary Study
Paper illustration of a branching category tree with a highlighted search path and possible dead ends.
UX Research
Tree Testing
Paper illustration for Solution Interview
Product Discovery
Solution Interview
Paper illustration showing three sorted card stacks and an open question about a possible group.
UX Research
Card Sorting
Purposedifferent
When experiences build up over days or weeks and a single session cannot capture them, Diary Study records the course of everyday life. Recurring triggers, moods, and habits become visible this way, beyond the sharpness of memory.When a navigation exists but search paths still fail, tree testing checks findability without visual distraction. The method shows whether labels, levels, and paths really lead to the intended destination.When a solution idea is already on the table, it checks how it is understood and evaluated. It looks for resonance, objections, and missing fit early in the conversation.When content only makes sense internally and users can't find the structure again, card sorting exposes their mental order. Terms, groups, and naming are then aligned with the target group's expectations.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumMediumLow
Timedifferent
1-4 Wochen1-2 Tage30-60 min je Interview20-45 min
Participantsdifferent
5-20Based on research question5-10 InterviewsBased on research question
Formatdifferent
AsyncAsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Diary Entries, Longitudinal Patterns, Experience TimelineFindability Metrics, Path Analysis, Revised IASolution Feedback, Objection List, Validation NotesContent groups, Label set, IA hypotheses
Tagsno overlap
UX researchTrackingBehavior
Information architectureNavigationFindability
ValidationInterviewsPrototype
Information architectureNavigationStructure
Add more methods