methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Diary Study.
UX Research
Diary Study
Surveys method illustration showing its working structure
UX Research
Surveys
Paper illustration showing three sorted card stacks and an open question about a possible group.
UX Research
Card Sorting
Paper illustration of a branching category tree with a highlighted search path and possible dead ends.
UX Research
Tree Testing
Purposedifferent
When experiences build up over days or weeks and a single session cannot capture them, Diary Study records the course of everyday life. Recurring triggers, moods, and habits become visible this way, beyond the sharpness of memory.When a topic needs to be validated broadly and many people can answer the same question, surveys gather structured feedback in a scalable form. Answers become comparable and segmentable instead of remaining merely anecdotal.When content only makes sense internally and users can't find the structure again, card sorting exposes their mental order. Terms, groups, and naming are then aligned with the target group's expectations.When a navigation exists but search paths still fail, tree testing checks findability without visual distraction. The method shows whether labels, levels, and paths really lead to the intended destination.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumLowMedium
Timedifferent
1-4 Wochen3-14 Tage20-45 min1-2 Tage
Participantsdifferent
5-2050+Based on research questionBased on research question
Formatdifferent
AsyncAsyncWorkshop + asyncAsync
Outputdifferent
Diary Entries, Longitudinal Patterns, Experience TimelineSurvey Results, Charts, Segment InsightsContent groups, Label set, IA hypothesesFindability Metrics, Path Analysis, Revised IA
Tagsno overlap
UX researchTrackingBehavior
QuantitativeResearchValidation
Information architectureNavigationStructure
Information architectureNavigationFindability
Add more methods