View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  UX Research Diary Study |  Operations Bottleneck Analysis |  UX Research Contextual Inquiry |  UX Research HEART Framework |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When experiences build up over days or weeks and a single session cannot capture them, Diary Study records the course of everyday life. Recurring triggers, moods, and habits become visible this way, beyond the sharpness of memory. | For a flow that backs up at one point, the method looks for the capacity limit with the greatest leverage. It explains why extra effort elsewhere barely improves throughput. | When work processes are known only from accounts and the real context stays hidden, Contextual Inquiry makes behavior at the workplace visible. Observation and follow-up questions together show how people actually work, get interrupted, and improvise. | Helps clarify observations, needs, and patterns in concrete terms. It groups observations into patterns, questions, and decisions. The result is captured as a HEART-GSM table and dashboard. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-4 Wochen | 1-3 h | 1-3 Wochen | 120 min initial, dann laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 5-20 | 3-8 | 4-12 Beobachtungen | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Diary Entries, Longitudinal Patterns, Experience Timeline | Bottleneck Map, Flow Metrics, Improvement Options, Follow-up Measures | Field Notes, Workflow Insights, Pain Points | HEART-GSM Table, Dashboard |
Tagsno overlap | UX researchTrackingBehavior | FlowMeasurementConstraints | UX researchObservationContext | MetricsUX researchMeasurementSatisfaction |