View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Delegation Poker |  Innovation Round Robin Brainstorming |  Facilitation Responsibility Poker |  Innovation Reverse Brainstorming |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When decisions get stuck between leadership and team, Delegation Poker clarifies the desired scope of autonomy. It shows how much decision-making latitude a role should actually get in practice. | With unevenly distributed speaking time, the method brings every person into the contribution one after another. It prevents early voices from setting the direction while still producing a shared idea space. This makes participation plannable and the team's diversity visible. | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. | For persistent errors or blockages, the method shifts the view to the opposite of the desired effect. It exposes the mechanics of failure and makes hidden causes easier to grasp. This makes improvement more concrete and the problem clearer. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 20-45 min | 45-90 min | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 4-10 | 3-10 | 3-12 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Delegation Board, Decision Boundaries, Role Agreements | Idea List, Cluster, Shortlist | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions | Reverse Ideas, Risk Themes, Solution Ideas |
Tagsno overlap | AutonomyRolesTeam | BrainstormingIdeationFacilitationInclusionCreativity | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation | BrainstormingIdeationCreativityRisk |