View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Delegation Poker |  Facilitation Lean Coffee |  Innovation Rapid Ideation |  Facilitation Responsibility Poker |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When decisions get stuck between leadership and team, Delegation Poker clarifies the desired scope of autonomy. It shows how much decision-making latitude a role should actually get in practice. | When a group without a fixed agenda needs to get into useful conversations quickly, Lean Coffee structures the start around interests rather than a presentation. The group itself negotiates which topics get time first and which wait. | When a decision needs to be prepared quickly, the method generates many solution-close variants in a short time. It deliberately relies on pace to undercut self-censorship and perfectionism. This quickly produces a usable field for prioritization and further work. | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 30-90 min | 5-20 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 3-20 | 1-20 | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Delegation Board, Decision Boundaries, Role Agreements | Prioritized Topics, Discussion Notes, Action Items | Ideenpool, Roh-Shortlist, Cluster | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions |
Tagsno overlap | AutonomyRolesTeam | FacilitationAutonomyDialogue | BrainstormingIdeationDivergenceSpeed | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation |