View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Delegation PokerLASR (Lightweight Approach for Software Reviews)Fishbowl DiscussionResponsibility Poker
| Criterion | ![]() Facilitation Delegation Poker | ![]() Architecture LASR (Lightweight Approach for Software Reviews) | ![]() Facilitation Fishbowl Discussion | ![]() Facilitation Responsibility Poker |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When decisions get stuck between leadership and team, Delegation Poker clarifies the desired scope of autonomy. It shows how much decision-making latitude a role should actually get in practice. | LASR helps development teams identify where their software falls short of important quality goals and which improvements to consider. A small group with existing system knowledge can make an initial assessment and investigate open questions in more detail. | When a controversial topic needs depth and discipline at the same time, Fishbowl Discussion makes the structure of the conversation transparent. The format keeps the core small enough for real dialogue and open enough for controlled turnover. | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 3–4 h for initial assessment; preparation and deeper analysis additional | 45-90 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 1 or a small team; particularly suitable for 3–4 people | 8-80 | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Delegation Board, Decision Boundaries, Role Agreements | Lean Mission Statement describing the software’s purpose, Prioritized quality goals and evaluation criteria, Risks and estimated gaps against quality goals, More closely examined findings and open checks | Discussion Insights, Observed Tensions, Follow-up Questions | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions |
Tagsno overlap | AutonomyRolesTeam | ArchitectureQualityRiskAssessmentLean | FacilitationDialogueLarge group | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation |



