View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Delegation Poker |  Architecture C4 Model |  Delivery Communication Plan |  Delivery Shape Up |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When decisions get stuck between leadership and team, Delegation Poker clarifies the desired scope of autonomy. It shows how much decision-making latitude a role should actually get in practice. | The C4 Model makes a system legible across several resolution levels, from context down to code. It suits situations where different audiences need to understand the same architecture from different altitudes. | When many people need to be informed in parallel and messages would otherwise arrive unevenly or too late, a Communication Plan orders communication reliably. Channels, audiences, and cadences interlock so important information doesn't get lost. | Shape Up helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow. It makes work boundaries and decisions explicit and captures results as pitches, bet-table decisions, and hill charts. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 1-4 h | 45-90 min | 6 Wochen Cycle + 2 Wochen Cool-Down |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 1-5 | 2-6 | 2-4 pro Pitch |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Delegation Board, Decision Boundaries, Role Agreements | Context Diagram, Container Diagram, Component Diagram | Communication Plan, Channel Matrix, Message Cadence | Pitches, Bet-table decisions, Hill charts, Cooldown outcomes |
Tagsno overlap | AutonomyRolesTeam | ArchitectureCommunicationVisualization | CommunicationStakeholdersDeliveryPlanning | PlanningDeliveryAutonomy |