methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Decision Tree method illustration showing its working structure
Decision Making
Decision Tree
Software Architecture Canvas method illustration showing its working structure
Architecture
Software Architecture Canvas
A paper-based illustration representing C4 Model with its core stages and visible working result.
Architecture
C4 Model
Paper illustration of the Consensus Workshop working structure.
Facilitation
Consensus Workshop
Purposedifferent
For decisions with follow-on paths and dependencies, a linear comparison is often not enough. A Decision Tree shows how options branch under conditions and which consequences hang on each branch.The Software Architecture Canvas reduces a system to the most important architecture decisions, constraints, and interfaces. It is useful when teams need a resilient overall picture quickly.The C4 Model makes a system legible across several resolution levels, from context down to code. It suits situations where different audiences need to understand the same architecture from different altitudes.When a group needs a solid decision without outvoting individual factions, a Consensus Workshop creates a negotiable common ground. It makes agreement, reservations, and open tensions discussable at the same time.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowLowMedium
Timedifferent
30-90 min1-2 h1-4 h1-3 h
Participantsdifferent
1-63-101-55-30
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Decision Tree, Option Map, Assumption ListArchitecture Canvas, Goals, Constraints, Quality AttributesContext Diagram, Container Diagram, Component DiagramConsensus Clusters, Theme Titles, Priority Areas
Tagsno overlap
DecisionTreeOptions
CanvasArchitectureAlignmentWorkshop
ArchitectureCommunicationVisualization
FacilitationConsensusWorkshopAlignment
Add more methods