View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Decision Making Decision Tree |  UX Research Empathy Mapping |  Decision Making Pre-Mortem |  UX Research Affinity Diagramming |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | For decisions with follow-on paths and dependencies, a linear comparison is often not enough. A Decision Tree shows how options branch under conditions and which consequences hang on each branch. | When a lot is assumed about a target group but little is seen jointly, empathy mapping makes knowledge and gaps directly comparable. The picture also shows which assumptions hold up and where evidence is missing. | In early initiatives with many uncertainties, planning quickly turns too optimistic. A pre-mortem makes the expected failure visible in advance and sharpens the view of causes, gaps, and countermeasures. | When research notes, feedback, or observations sit unconnected side by side, affinity diagramming sorts the raw material into solid themes. Many individual points turn into patterns that make decisions and opportunities clearer. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 30-90 min | 30–60 min | 20–45 min | 45–90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 1-6 | 4-8 | Small cross-functional group | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Decision Tree, Option Map, Assumption List | Empathy Map, Assumptions List, Research Gaps | Risk list, Mitigation plan, Assumption log | Theme clusters, Insight statements, Opportunity areas |
Tagsno overlap | DecisionTreeOptions | SynthesisQualitativeWorkshop | RiskDecisionFailurePlanning | SynthesisQualitativeRoot cause |