methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Decision Rights Mapping with its method-specific working model.
Decision Making
Decision Rights Mapping
Paper illustration of an activity-role table with clear RACI assignments and one highlighted accountable role per activity.
Operations
RACI Matrix
A hypothetical failure makes concrete risks, signals, and fitting mitigations visible.
Decision Making
Pre-Mortem
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method
Purposedifferent
In organizations with many stakeholders, it often blurs who actually decides and who is merely consulted. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement.With unclear responsibilities across several roles or areas, the method creates unambiguous accountability logic. It reduces friction because decision, execution, contribution, and information become separately visible.In early initiatives with many uncertainties, planning quickly turns too optimistic. A pre-mortem makes the expected failure visible in advance and sharpens the view of causes, gaps, and countermeasures.With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowLowLow
Timedifferent
90-180 min45-90 min20–45 min10-20 min daily
Participantsdifferent
4-122-8Small cross-functional group1
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshopAsync
Outputdifferent
Decision Rights Matrix, AgreementRACI Matrix, Responsibility Map, Decision NotesRisk list, Mitigation plan, Assumption logDaily Plan, Time Estimates, Review Notes
Tagsno overlap
DecisionGovernanceAlignmentResponsibility
RolesResponsibilityGovernanceOperations
RiskDecisionFailurePlanning
PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations
Add more methods