methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Decision Rights Mapping with its method-specific working model.
Decision Making
Decision Rights Mapping
Paper illustration of HEART Framework with its method-specific working model.
UX Research
HEART Framework
Paper illustration of KPI Tree with its method-specific working model.
Product Strategy
KPI Tree
Paper illustration for Alignment Mapping.
Facilitation
Alignment Mapping
Purposedifferent
In organizations with many stakeholders, it often blurs who actually decides and who is merely consulted. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement.Helps clarify observations, needs, and patterns in concrete terms. It groups observations into patterns, questions, and decisions. The result is captured as a HEART-GSM table and dashboard.When metrics across the organization drift apart, it arranges drivers and effects under one shared logic. It connects customer value, product logic, and decision priorities. The result is captured as a KPI tree and owner list.When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable.
Complexitysame
MediumMediumMediumMedium
Timedifferent
90-180 min120 min initial, dann laufend90-180 min initial, dann laufend1-2 h
Participantsdifferent
4-123-63-84-12
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Decision Rights Matrix, AgreementHEART-GSM Table, DashboardKPI Tree, Owner ListAlignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions
Tagsno overlap
DecisionGovernanceAlignmentResponsibility
MetricsUX researchMeasurementSatisfaction
MetricsStrategyAlignmentMeasurement
AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation
Add more methods