methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Decision Rights Mapping with its method-specific working model.
Decision Making
Decision Rights Mapping
Paper illustration for Dot Estimation.
Facilitation
Dot Estimation
Paper illustration of RAID Log with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Delivery
RAID Log
Paper illustration for Alignment Mapping.
Facilitation
Alignment Mapping
Purposedifferent
In organizations with many stakeholders, it often blurs who actually decides and who is merely consulted. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement.When size or effort can only be estimated roughly, Dot Estimation condenses the group's experience into a quick range. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as an Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, and Discussion Targets.Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting.When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowLowMedium
Timedifferent
90-180 min5-20 min30 min Setup, dann laufend1-2 h
Participantsdifferent
4-123-201-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone4-12
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshopAsyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Decision Rights Matrix, AgreementEffort Heatmap, Risk Signals, Discussion TargetsRAID Log, Status Report SourceAlignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions
Tagsno overlap
DecisionGovernanceAlignmentResponsibility
EstimationEffortRisk
RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance
AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation
Add more methods