View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Decision Rights MappingATAM (Architecture Tradeoff Analysis Method)Request for CommentsStakeholder Salience Model
| Criterion |  Decision Making Decision Rights Mapping |  Architecture ATAM (Architecture Tradeoff Analysis Method) |  Architecture Request for Comments |  Facilitation Stakeholder Salience Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | In organizations with many stakeholders, it often blurs who actually decides and who is merely consulted. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement. | ATAM helps teams weigh architecture decisions when quality goals compete. The team considers business goals, stakeholder expectations, and technical decisions together. The evaluation shows which risks need further investigation. | An RFC clarifies architecture context, options, and consequences. It structures technical context, alternatives, tradeoffs, open questions, and review feedback, and captures the result as an RFC document, reviewer comments, and a decision rationale. | When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | High | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 90-180 min | Several meetings plus preparation and analysis; total effort depends on scope | 1-3 Wochen vom Draft bis zur Entscheidung | 60-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | Evaluation team, architects, and relevant stakeholders | 3-20 Reviewer | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Decision Rights Matrix, Agreement | Prioritized quality scenarios in a utility tree, Architecture risks with reasoning and assumptions, Sensitivity and trade-off points, Findings report with open investigations | RFC document, Reviewer comments, Decision rationale, Follow-up ADR or tickets | Salience Diagram, Strategy per Class |
Tagsno overlap | DecisionGovernanceAlignmentResponsibility | ArchitectureQualityRiskTradeoffsStakeholders | ArchitectureDecisionAsyncGovernance | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance |