View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Decision Making Decision Matrix |  Agile Planning Poker |  Decision Making Trade-off Analysis |  Agile Affinity Estimation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When several options collide with several criteria, comparison quickly becomes subjective. A Decision Matrix makes the trade-off visible and brings weighting, criteria, and options into a shared logic. | When estimates within the team diverge too much, it puts differing expectations on a common test bench. It separates rough complexity from unspoken assumptions. | With limited resources, quality, speed, cost, and risk almost always compete with each other. Trade-off Analysis makes these tensions explicit and prevents decisions from producing hidden side effects. | When many tasks need to be classified quickly, it sorts them by perceived effort and similarity. It reduces the effort of fine-grained estimation for large volumes. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 2-5 min je Item | 45-120 min | 30-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 3-9 | 2-8 | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Decision Matrix, Scoring Rationale, Selected Option | Relative Estimates, Assumption Notes, Split Candidates | Trade-off Matrix, Criteria List, Decision Rationale, Accepted Downsides | Affinity Size Map, Grouped Estimates, Unclear Items |
Tagsno overlap | DecisionCriteriaScoringTradeoffs | EstimationAgileRelative sizingTeam | TradeoffsDecisionCriteriaOptions | EstimationBacklogRelative sizing |