methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of the Lightning Decision Jam working structure.
Facilitation
Decision Jam
Paper illustration of Cost of Delay with its method-specific working model.
Delivery
Cost of Delay
Paper illustration for Root Cause Analysis.
Operations
Root Cause Analysis
Paper illustration for Pareto Analysis
Decision Making
Pareto Analysis
Purposedifferent
When a decision is stuck, Decision Jam loosens the knot through structured separation of problem, idea, and selection. The format creates movement without jumping prematurely at the first seemingly elegant answer.Helps clarify scope, order, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, constraints, and sequence manageable. The result is captured as a Cost of Delay table and prioritization sequence.When a problem keeps recurring and the cause stays unclear, the method exposes the underlying mechanism. It separates symptom, guess, and robust explanation from one another.In many problem situations, effect is distributed unequally across many causes. A Pareto Analysis separates the few drivers with high leverage from the long remainder and focuses attention on what measurably moves the needle.
Complexitydifferent
LowHighMediumLow
Timedifferent
60-90 min90-180 min1-4 h30-60 min
Participantsdifferent
4-103-83-81-6
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Problem Cluster, Prioritized Challenge, ExperimentCoD Table, Prioritization SequenceProblem Statement, Cause Hypotheses, Confirmed Causes, Action PlanPareto Chart, Top Causes, Focus List
Tagsno overlap
FacilitationDecisionProblem solvingWorkshop
PrioritizationDeliveryEconomicsDecision
Root causeProblem solvingQualityIncident
PrioritizationQualityFocusRoot cause
Add more methods