View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:DACIStrategic, Tactical and Operational PlanningRequest for CommentsArchitecture Decision Record
| Criterion |  Decision Making DACI |  Business Strategy Strategic, Tactical and Operational Planning |  Architecture Request for Comments |  Architecture Architecture Decision Record |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | In cross-functional decisions, responsibilities quickly blur between approval, influence, and execution. DACI arranges these roles so decision pressure, contribution, and information stay cleanly separated. | It places decisions and artifacts at the right level. Strategic planning clarifies direction, tactical planning translates it into programs, and operational planning steers concrete processes. | An RFC clarifies architecture context, options, and consequences. It structures technical context, alternatives, tradeoffs, open questions, and review feedback, and captures the result as an RFC document, reviewer comments, and a decision rationale. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min | 90-180 min | 1-3 Wochen vom Draft bis zur Entscheidung | 15-45 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-10 | 4-12 | 3-20 Reviewer | 1-3 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async | Async |
Outputdifferent | DACI Matrix, Decision Owner, Decision Log | Planning Levels Map, Cadence Model, Planning Artifact Inventory | RFC document, Reviewer comments, Decision rationale, Follow-up ADR or tickets | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale |
Tags1 shared | DecisionRolesGovernanceAlignment | CadenceGovernanceExecution | ArchitectureDecisionAsyncGovernance | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance |