methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for DACI
Decision Making
DACI
Paper illustration for RAPID
Decision Making
RAPID
Paper illustration for Impact Filter
Decision Making
Impact Filter
Paper illustration of Request for Comments (RFC) with its method-specific working model.
Architecture
Request for Comments
Purposedifferent
In cross-functional decisions, responsibilities quickly blur between approval, influence, and execution. DACI arranges these roles so decision pressure, contribution, and information stay cleanly separated.In complex management decisions, clarity is often missing about who recommends, who agrees, and who makes the decision. RAPID creates this assignment and stabilizes decisions across several levels.With new ideas or requests, the conversation often turns to solutions too early and to effect too little. An Impact Filter forces the initiative into an effect perspective and checks whether it creates a relevant difference.An RFC clarifies architecture context, options, and consequences. It structures technical context, alternatives, tradeoffs, open questions, and review feedback, and captures the result as an RFC document, reviewer comments, and a decision rationale.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumLowMedium
Timedifferent
30-60 min45-90 min20-45 min1-3 Wochen vom Draft bis zur Entscheidung
Participantsdifferent
2-103-121-63-20 Reviewer
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncAsync
Outputdifferent
DACI Matrix, Decision Owner, Decision LogRAPID Role Map, Recommendation, Decision LogImpact Filter, Success Criteria, Next StepRFC document, Reviewer comments, Decision rationale, Follow-up ADR or tickets
Tags1 shared
DecisionRolesGovernanceAlignment
DecisionRolesGovernance
ImpactOutcomesFramingDecision
ArchitectureDecisionAsyncGovernance
Add more methods