methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for DACI
Decision Making
DACI
First-click Testing method illustration showing its working structure
UX Research
First-click Testing
Paper illustration for RAPID
Decision Making
RAPID
Paper illustration of Request for Comments (RFC) with its method-specific working model.
Architecture
Request for Comments
Purposedifferent
In cross-functional decisions, responsibilities quickly blur between approval, influence, and execution. DACI arranges these roles so decision pressure, contribution, and information stay cleanly separated.When users immediately turn the wrong way on a screen or wireframe, first click testing checks initial orientation at high speed. The first click shows early whether expectation, labeling, and wayfinding fit together.In complex management decisions, clarity is often missing about who recommends, who agrees, and who makes the decision. RAPID creates this assignment and stabilizes decisions across several levels.An RFC clarifies architecture context, options, and consequences. It structures technical context, alternatives, tradeoffs, open questions, and review feedback, and captures the result as an RFC document, reviewer comments, and a decision rationale.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowMediumMedium
Timedifferent
30-60 min1-2 Tage45-90 min1-3 Wochen vom Draft bis zur Entscheidung
Participantsdifferent
2-1010-303-123-20 Reviewer
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncAsyncWorkshop + asyncAsync
Outputdifferent
DACI Matrix, Decision Owner, Decision LogClick Heatmap, Success Rate, Design RecommendationsRAPID Role Map, Recommendation, Decision LogRFC document, Reviewer comments, Decision rationale, Follow-up ADR or tickets
Tagsno overlap
DecisionRolesGovernanceAlignment
UXNavigationFindabilityValidation
DecisionRolesGovernance
ArchitectureDecisionAsyncGovernance
Add more methods