methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Cynefin Workshop.
Decision Making
Cynefin Workshop
Paper illustration of a Polarity Map with two poles and four quadrants
Systems Thinking
Polarity Mapping
Paper illustration of a decision table with criteria rows, weighted ratings, and a narrowly leading alternative.
Decision Making
Decision Matrix
Paper illustration for Soft Systems Methodology.
Systems Thinking
Soft Systems Methodology
Purposedifferent
When problems are unclear, chaotic, or only seemingly familiar, standard recipes fall short. A Cynefin Workshop sorts situations by the nature of their problem and connects them with matching action logic.Polarity Mapping makes tensions between two opposing poles tangible, such as standardization and adaptation or control and autonomy. The method guards against making apparent either-or decisions prematurely.When several options collide with several criteria, comparison quickly becomes subjective. A Decision Matrix makes the trade-off visible and brings weighting, criteria, and options into a shared logic.Soft Systems Methodology helps explore unclear or politically charged problems systematically. Instead of forcing a quick answer, the method builds a shared understanding of perspectives and room for action.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumMediumHigh
Timedifferent
60-180 min1-2 h45-90 min0.5-3 Tage
Participantsdifferent
4-203-122-85-15
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Cynefin Map, Domain-specific Actions, Sensemaking NotesPolarity Map, Warning Signs, Balance ActionsDecision Matrix, Scoring Rationale, Selected OptionRich Picture, Root Definitions, Conceptual Models, Change Agenda
Tagsno overlap
ComplexitySensemakingDecision
Systems thinkingTradeoffsLeadership
DecisionCriteriaScoringTradeoffs
Soft systemsComplexitySensemakingSystems thinking
Add more methods