methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Cynefin Workshop.
Decision Making
Cynefin Workshop
Paper illustration of HEART Framework with its method-specific working model.
UX Research
HEART Framework
Paper illustration for Argument Mapping
Decision Making
Argument Mapping
Paper illustration of Counter Metrics with its method-specific working model.
Product Strategy
Counter Metrics
Purposedifferent
When problems are unclear, chaotic, or only seemingly familiar, standard recipes fall short. A Cynefin Workshop sorts situations by the nature of their problem and connects them with matching action logic.Helps clarify observations, needs, and patterns in concrete terms. It groups observations into patterns, questions, and decisions. The result is captured as a HEART-GSM table and dashboard.When statements, evidence, and counterarguments get mixed up, a debate quickly loses its structure. Argument Mapping breaks a thesis down into its reasoning and makes visible what it really rests on.When a headline metric could mask side effects, it adds guardrail signals against unwanted outcomes. It connects customer value, product logic, and decision priorities. The result is captured as a counter-metric list and guardrail definitions.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumMediumLow
Timedifferent
60-180 min120 min initial, dann laufend1-3 h30-60 min
Participantsdifferent
4-203-61-82-6
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Cynefin Map, Domain-specific Actions, Sensemaking NotesHEART-GSM Table, DashboardArgument Map, Evidence Gaps, Decision RationaleCounter Metric List, Guardrail Definitions
Tagsno overlap
ComplexitySensemakingDecision
MetricsUX researchMeasurementSatisfaction
SensemakingDecisionRationale
MetricsMeasurementStrategyExperiments
Add more methods