View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Systems Thinking Current Reality Tree | ![]() Innovation Contradiction Analysis | ![]() Operations Causal Factor Analysis | ![]() Innovation TRIZ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | A Current Reality Tree condenses many symptoms into a few causal chains. The method makes visible which core problems drive several negative effects at once. | When a system should improve while another measure suffers as a result, the method makes the underlying conflict precisely formulable. It separates the desired effect from its side effect. This makes solutions possible that address the contradiction deliberately instead of half-heartedly. | For an event with a complicated course, the method breaks down the contributing factors along the timeline. It shows how conditions, decisions, and reactions together produce a course of events. | For technical contradictions or trade-offs, the method looks for solutions that resolve opposing requirements at the same time. It translates limits into an explicit picture of conflict that becomes workable. This produces not just compromises but more elegant principles. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Medium | High | High |
Timedifferent | 2-6 h | 60-120 min | 2-6 h | 1-4 h |
Participantsdifferent | 3-8 | 2-8 | 3-10 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Current Reality Tree, Core Problems, Intervention Ideas | Contradiction Statement, Abstraction Notes, Solution Principles, Concept Ideas | Event Timeline, Causal Factor Chart, Cause List, Corrective Actions | Contradiction Statement, Inventive Principles, Solution Concepts |
Tagsno overlap | Systems thinkingRoot causeConstraintsCausality | ContradictionsInnovationProblem solving | CausalityIncidentRoot causeTimeline | InnovationProblem solvingContradictionsCreativity |



