View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Strategy Counter Metrics | ![]() Architecture C4 Model | ![]() Business Strategy Balanced Scorecard | ![]() Architecture arc42 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a headline metric could mask side effects, it adds guardrail signals against unwanted outcomes. It connects customer value, product logic, and decision priorities. The result is captured as a counter-metric list and guardrail definitions. | The C4 Model makes a system legible across several resolution levels, from context down to code. It suits situations where different audiences need to understand the same architecture from different altitudes. | Balanced Scorecard translates strategy into a few interconnected perspectives and metrics. It holds impact, steering, and learning together in daily work instead of narrowing strategy down to financial figures. | arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | High | Low |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min | 1-4 h | Halber Tag bis mehrere Wochen | 1-2 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 2-6 | 1-5 | 4-12 | 1-4 |
Formatsame | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Counter Metric List, Guardrail Definitions | Context Diagram, Container Diagram, Component Diagram | Balanced Scorecard, Strategic Measures, Initiative Map | Architecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment View |
Tagsno overlap | MetricsMeasurementStrategyExperiments | ArchitectureCommunicationVisualization | StrategyMetricsExecution | ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication |



