View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Innovation Contradiction Analysis |  Product Discovery Problem Interview |  Innovation TRIZ |  Product Discovery Fake Door Test |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a system should improve while another measure suffers as a result, the method makes the underlying conflict precisely formulable. It separates the desired effect from its side effect. This makes solutions possible that address the contradiction deliberately instead of half-heartedly. | When the picture of the problem still needs to become solid, it asks about real situations and consequences. It separates genuine suffering from mere interest in a solution. | For technical contradictions or trade-offs, the method looks for solutions that resolve opposing requirements at the same time. It translates limits into an explicit picture of conflict that becomes workable. This produces not just compromises but more elegant principles. | When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | High | Medium |
Timedifferent | 60-120 min | 30-60 min je Interview | 1-4 h | 1-5 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 5-12 Interviews | 2-8 | Nutzertraffic |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Async |
Outputdifferent | Contradiction Statement, Abstraction Notes, Solution Principles, Concept Ideas | Problem Evidence, Risk Notes, Customer Segments | Contradiction Statement, Inventive Principles, Solution Concepts | Click Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision |
Tagsno overlap | ContradictionsInnovationProblem solving | DiscoveryInterviewsValidation | InnovationProblem solvingContradictionsCreativity | ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery |