View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Contextual InquiryStandard Work AnalysisFailure Mode and Effects Analysis8D Problem Solving
| Criterion |  UX Research Contextual Inquiry |  Operations Standard Work Analysis |  Operations Failure Mode and Effects Analysis |  Operations 8D Problem Solving |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When work processes are known only from accounts and the real context stays hidden, Contextual Inquiry makes behavior at the workplace visible. Observation and follow-up questions together show how people actually work, get interrupted, and improvise. | When the same task is done differently depending on the person, the method exposes the reliable core. It creates comparability without unnecessarily choking off needed latitude. | For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability. | For an acute quality or delivery problem, the method structures immediate protection and root cause work together. It keeps the situation stable while the actual cause is investigated cleanly. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | High | High |
Timedifferent | 1-3 Wochen | 1-3 h | 2-6 h | 1-6 Wochen |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 Beobachtungen | 2-6 | 3-10 | 4-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Field Notes, Workflow Insights, Pain Points | Standard Work Sheet, Deviation List, Improved Standard, Training Needs | FMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation Actions | 8D Report, Containment Plan, Root Cause Evidence, Corrective Action Plan |
Tagsno overlap | UX researchObservationContext | LeanProcessQuality | RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause | QualityProblem solvingRoot cause |