methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Contextual Inquiry.
UX Research
Contextual Inquiry
Paper illustration of a six-field PESTLE grid
Business Strategy
PESTLE Analysis
Context Map workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Domain Modeling
Context Map
Paper illustration of a two-by-two Ansoff Matrix with four growth directions
Business Strategy
Ansoff Matrix
Purposedifferent
When work processes are known only from accounts and the real context stays hidden, Contextual Inquiry makes behavior at the workplace visible. Observation and follow-up questions together show how people actually work, get interrupted, and improvise.PESTLE Analysis makes political, economic, social, technological, legal, and environmental influences visible. The environment of an initiative is thereby read systematically instead of through isolated trends.When several contexts need to talk to each other, it makes their relationships and dependencies legible. It helps sort integration pressure and responsibilities across system boundaries.The Ansoff Matrix organizes growth options by market and product relation. It helps weigh expansion, diversification, and adaptation cleanly against each other.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumMediumLow
Timedifferent
1-3 Wochen1-3 h1-3 h45-90 min
Participantsdifferent
4-12 Beobachtungen2-102-82-8
Formatsame
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Field Notes, Workflow Insights, Pain PointsPESTLE Map, External Risks, Strategic QuestionsContext Map, Integration Patterns, Boundary NotesAnsoff Matrix, Growth Options, Risk Notes
Tagsno overlap
UX researchObservationContext
StrategyMarketAnalysis
Domain-Driven DesignBoundariesStrategy
GrowthStrategyMarketPortfolio
Add more methods