methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Contextual Inquiry.
UX Research
Contextual Inquiry
Paper illustration for Domain Context Map
Domain Modeling
Domain Context Map
Paper illustration of HEART Framework with its method-specific working model.
UX Research
HEART Framework
Paper illustration of Counter Metrics with its method-specific working model.
Product Strategy
Counter Metrics
Purposedifferent
When work processes are known only from accounts and the real context stays hidden, Contextual Inquiry makes behavior at the workplace visible. Observation and follow-up questions together show how people actually work, get interrupted, and improvise.When a domain model and its associated contexts need to be thought through together, it creates a shared overview. It connects the business view and organizational boundary into a readable whole.Helps clarify observations, needs, and patterns in concrete terms. It groups observations into patterns, questions, and decisions. The result is captured as a HEART-GSM table and dashboard.When a headline metric could mask side effects, it adds guardrail signals against unwanted outcomes. It connects customer value, product logic, and decision priorities. The result is captured as a counter-metric list and guardrail definitions.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumMediumLow
Timedifferent
1-3 Wochen1-3 h120 min initial, dann laufend30-60 min
Participantsdifferent
4-12 Beobachtungen3-103-62-6
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Field Notes, Workflow Insights, Pain PointsDomain Context Map, Boundary Notes, Ownership MapHEART-GSM Table, DashboardCounter Metric List, Guardrail Definitions
Tagsno overlap
UX researchObservationContext
Domain-Driven DesignContextBoundaries
MetricsUX researchMeasurementSatisfaction
MetricsMeasurementStrategyExperiments
Add more methods