methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Contextual Inquiry.
UX Research
Contextual Inquiry
Paper illustration for Bottleneck Analysis.
Operations
Bottleneck Analysis
A hypothetical failure makes concrete risks, signals, and fitting mitigations visible.
Decision Making
Pre-Mortem
Paper illustration of HEART Framework with its method-specific working model.
UX Research
HEART Framework
Purposedifferent
When work processes are known only from accounts and the real context stays hidden, Contextual Inquiry makes behavior at the workplace visible. Observation and follow-up questions together show how people actually work, get interrupted, and improvise.For a flow that backs up at one point, the method looks for the capacity limit with the greatest leverage. It explains why extra effort elsewhere barely improves throughput.In early initiatives with many uncertainties, planning quickly turns too optimistic. A pre-mortem makes the expected failure visible in advance and sharpens the view of causes, gaps, and countermeasures.Helps clarify observations, needs, and patterns in concrete terms. It groups observations into patterns, questions, and decisions. The result is captured as a HEART-GSM table and dashboard.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumLowMedium
Timedifferent
1-3 Wochen1-3 h20–45 min120 min initial, dann laufend
Participantsdifferent
4-12 Beobachtungen3-8Small cross-functional group3-6
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Field Notes, Workflow Insights, Pain PointsBottleneck Map, Flow Metrics, Improvement Options, Follow-up MeasuresRisk list, Mitigation plan, Assumption logHEART-GSM Table, Dashboard
Tagsno overlap
UX researchObservationContext
FlowMeasurementConstraints
RiskDecisionFailurePlanning
MetricsUX researchMeasurementSatisfaction
Add more methods