methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Contextual Inquiry.
UX Research
Contextual Inquiry
Paper illustration of a two-by-two Ansoff Matrix with four growth directions
Business Strategy
Ansoff Matrix
Context Map workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Domain Modeling
Context Map
Paper illustration of a six-field PESTLE grid
Business Strategy
PESTLE Analysis
Purposedifferent
When work processes are known only from accounts and the real context stays hidden, Contextual Inquiry makes behavior at the workplace visible. Observation and follow-up questions together show how people actually work, get interrupted, and improvise.The Ansoff Matrix organizes growth options by market and product relation. It helps weigh expansion, diversification, and adaptation cleanly against each other.When several contexts need to talk to each other, it makes their relationships and dependencies legible. It helps sort integration pressure and responsibilities across system boundaries.PESTLE Analysis makes political, economic, social, technological, legal, and environmental influences visible. The environment of an initiative is thereby read systematically instead of through isolated trends.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowMediumMedium
Timedifferent
1-3 Wochen45-90 min1-3 h1-3 h
Participantsdifferent
4-12 Beobachtungen2-82-82-10
Formatsame
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Field Notes, Workflow Insights, Pain PointsAnsoff Matrix, Growth Options, Risk NotesContext Map, Integration Patterns, Boundary NotesPESTLE Map, External Risks, Strategic Questions
Tagsno overlap
UX researchObservationContext
GrowthStrategyMarketPortfolio
Domain-Driven DesignBoundariesStrategy
StrategyMarketAnalysis
Add more methods