methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Constraint Analysis.
Decision Making
Constraint Analysis
Paper illustration of Hooked Model with its method-specific working model.
Growth
Hooked Model
Decision Tree method illustration showing its working structure
Decision Making
Decision Tree
A paper-based illustration representing North Star Metric with its core stages and visible working result.
Growth
North Star Metric
Purposedifferent
When an initiative stalls, the limit often lies not in the idea but in hard or soft boundary conditions. Constraint Analysis separates these limits and shows which of them can actually be shaped.The Hooked Model helps clarify engagement loops, user behavior, and experiments. It makes repeat behavior measurable and captures the result as a hooked loop, trigger map, and reward design.For decisions with follow-on paths and dependencies, a linear comparison is often not enough. A Decision Tree shows how options branch under conditions and which consequences hang on each branch.When product teams track many metrics, the view of the actual customer outcome easily gets lost. A North Star Metric bundles growth, usage, and value contribution into one signal that makes the system's direction visible.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumMediumMedium
Timedifferent
30-90 minMultiple workshops over several weeks30-90 min1-2 h
Participantsdifferent
2-82-81-63-8
Formatsame
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Constraint List, Hard/Soft Classification, Option Impact Notes, Decision BoundariesHooked loop, Trigger map, Reward design, Ethics checkDecision Tree, Option Map, Assumption ListNorth Star metric, Input metric tree, Measurement cadence
Tagsno overlap
ConstraintsDecisionPlanningOptions
GrowthBehaviorRetention
DecisionTreeOptions
GrowthMetricsAlignmentRetention
Add more methods