methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Constraint Analysis.
Decision Making
Constraint Analysis
Paper illustration of HEART Framework with its method-specific working model.
UX Research
HEART Framework
Decision Tree method illustration showing its working structure
Decision Making
Decision Tree
Paper illustration of Counter Metrics with its method-specific working model.
Product Strategy
Counter Metrics
Purposedifferent
When an initiative stalls, the limit often lies not in the idea but in hard or soft boundary conditions. Constraint Analysis separates these limits and shows which of them can actually be shaped.Helps clarify observations, needs, and patterns in concrete terms. It groups observations into patterns, questions, and decisions. The result is captured as a HEART-GSM table and dashboard.For decisions with follow-on paths and dependencies, a linear comparison is often not enough. A Decision Tree shows how options branch under conditions and which consequences hang on each branch.When a headline metric could mask side effects, it adds guardrail signals against unwanted outcomes. It connects customer value, product logic, and decision priorities. The result is captured as a counter-metric list and guardrail definitions.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumMediumLow
Timedifferent
30-90 min120 min initial, dann laufend30-90 min30-60 min
Participantsdifferent
2-83-61-62-6
Formatsame
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Constraint List, Hard/Soft Classification, Option Impact Notes, Decision BoundariesHEART-GSM Table, DashboardDecision Tree, Option Map, Assumption ListCounter Metric List, Guardrail Definitions
Tagsno overlap
ConstraintsDecisionPlanningOptions
MetricsUX researchMeasurementSatisfaction
DecisionTreeOptions
MetricsMeasurementStrategyExperiments
Add more methods