methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Constraint Analysis.
Decision Making
Constraint Analysis
Affinity Diagramming
UX Research
Affinity Diagramming
A hypothetical failure makes concrete risks, signals, and fitting mitigations visible.
Decision Making
Pre-Mortem
Paper illustration for Current Reality Tree
Systems Thinking
Current Reality Tree
Purposedifferent
When an initiative stalls, the limit often lies not in the idea but in hard or soft boundary conditions. Constraint Analysis separates these limits and shows which of them can actually be shaped.When research notes, feedback, or observations sit unconnected side by side, affinity diagramming sorts the raw material into solid themes. Many individual points turn into patterns that make decisions and opportunities clearer.In early initiatives with many uncertainties, planning quickly turns too optimistic. A pre-mortem makes the expected failure visible in advance and sharpens the view of causes, gaps, and countermeasures.A Current Reality Tree condenses many symptoms into a few causal chains. The method makes visible which core problems drive several negative effects at once.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowLowHigh
Timedifferent
30-90 min45–90 min20–45 min2-6 h
Participantsdifferent
2-83-10Small cross-functional group3-8
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Constraint List, Hard/Soft Classification, Option Impact Notes, Decision BoundariesTheme clusters, Insight statements, Opportunity areasRisk list, Mitigation plan, Assumption logCurrent Reality Tree, Core Problems, Intervention Ideas
Tagsno overlap
ConstraintsDecisionPlanningOptions
SynthesisQualitativeRoot cause
RiskDecisionFailurePlanning
Systems thinkingRoot causeConstraintsCausality
Add more methods