View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Facilitation Consensus Workshop | ![]() Innovation Round Robin Brainstorming | ![]() Innovation TRIZ |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a group needs a solid decision without outvoting individual factions, a Consensus Workshop creates a negotiable common ground. It makes agreement, reservations, and open tensions discussable at the same time. | With unevenly distributed speaking time, the method brings every person into the contribution one after another. It prevents early voices from setting the direction while still producing a shared idea space. This makes participation plannable and the team's diversity visible. | For technical contradictions or trade-offs, the method looks for solutions that resolve opposing requirements at the same time. It translates limits into an explicit picture of conflict that becomes workable. This produces not just compromises but more elegant principles. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | High |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | 20-45 min | 1-4 h |
Participantsdifferent | 5-30 | 4-10 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Consensus Clusters, Theme Titles, Priority Areas | Idea List, Cluster, Shortlist | Contradiction Statement, Inventive Principles, Solution Concepts |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationConsensusWorkshopAlignment | BrainstormingIdeationFacilitationInclusionCreativity | InnovationProblem solvingContradictionsCreativity |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






