View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Facilitation Consensus Workshop | ![]() Product Strategy OKRs | ![]() Facilitation Nominal Group Technique | ![]() Product Strategy SMART Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a group needs a solid decision without outvoting individual factions, a Consensus Workshop creates a negotiable common ground. It makes agreement, reservations, and open tensions discussable at the same time. | When strategic direction needs to become measurable, it connects ambition with checkable results. It makes goals connectable to focus and review. | When loud voices could dominate a round, Nominal Group Technique protects individual thinking time from group effects. It collects ideas separately first and only then enables shared weighting. | When goals are formulated too generally, it brings measurability, direction, and timing into shape. It prevents intentions from staying without clear verification. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | 1-2 h Setup | 60-120 min | 15-30 min |
Participantsdifferent | 5-30 | 2-20 | 5-12 | 1-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Consensus Clusters, Theme Titles, Priority Areas | OKR set, Measurement plan, Review cadence | Ranked Ideas, Clarified Options, Group Priority | SMART Goal, Measurement Note, Deadline |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationConsensusWorkshopAlignment | GoalsAlignmentOutcomesMeasurement | FacilitationPrioritizationVotingInclusion | GoalsPlanningMeasurementAlignment |



