methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Concierge MVP
Product Discovery
Concierge MVP
Paper illustration for Trade-off Analysis.
Decision Making
Trade-off Analysis
Paper illustration for Problem Interview
Product Discovery
Problem Interview
Paper illustration of a decision table with criteria rows, weighted ratings, and a narrowly leading alternative.
Decision Making
Decision Matrix
Purposedifferent
When an idea can first fail or grow through genuine hands-on support, it relies on manual work instead of automation. It shows whether user value holds up even under manual execution.With limited resources, quality, speed, cost, and risk almost always compete with each other. Trade-off Analysis makes these tensions explicit and prevents decisions from producing hidden side effects.When the picture of the problem still needs to become solid, it asks about real situations and consequences. It separates genuine suffering from mere interest in a solution.When several options collide with several criteria, comparison quickly becomes subjective. A Decision Matrix makes the trade-off visible and brings weighting, criteria, and options into a shared logic.
Complexitysame
MediumMediumMediumMedium
Timedifferent
1-4 Wochen45-120 min30-60 min je Interview45-90 min
Participantsdifferent
3-10 Kunden2-85-12 Interviews2-8
Formatsame
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Concierge Learnings, Service Blueprint, MVP RisksTrade-off Matrix, Criteria List, Decision Rationale, Accepted DownsidesProblem Evidence, Risk Notes, Customer SegmentsDecision Matrix, Scoring Rationale, Selected Option
Tagsno overlap
MVPValidationServiceDiscovery
TradeoffsDecisionCriteriaOptions
DiscoveryInterviewsValidation
DecisionCriteriaScoringTradeoffs
Add more methods