View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Discovery Concierge MVP | ![]() Innovation Design Sprint | ![]() UX Research Card Sorting | ![]() Product Discovery Experiment Canvas |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When an idea can first fail or grow through genuine hands-on support, it relies on manual work instead of automation. It shows whether user value holds up even under manual execution. | When the product question is unclear and time pressure is high, the method takes a team from an open idea to a testable solution. It connects problem understanding, decision, and learning in one compact format, lowering the risk of spending a lot of energy on a mere guess. | When content only makes sense internally and users can't find the structure again, card sorting exposes their mental order. Terms, groups, and naming are then aligned with the target group's expectations. | When experiments become unreadable after the fact, it arranges hypothesis, signal, and learning goal on a single canvas. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a Completed Experiment Canvas and a Success Metric. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | High | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-4 Wochen | 4-5 Tage | 20-45 min | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 Kunden | 5-8 | Based on research question | 1-5 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Concierge Learnings, Service Blueprint, MVP Risks | Prototype, Test Findings, Decision Rationale | Content groups, Label set, IA hypotheses | Completed Experiment Canvas, Success Metric |
Tagsno overlap | MVPValidationServiceDiscovery | Design sprintPrototypeValidationInnovation | Information architectureNavigationStructure | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryHypothesis |



