View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Delivery Communication Plan |  Team Design Team API |  Facilitation Expectation Mapping |  Delivery Shape Up |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When many people need to be informed in parallel and messages would otherwise arrive unevenly or too late, a Communication Plan orders communication reliably. Channels, audiences, and cadences interlock so important information doesn't get lost. | When expectations between teams stay fuzzy, it describes how a team can be reached, used, and held accountable. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Team API document. | When roles, interfaces, or projects fail because of differing expectations, Expectation Mapping surfaces these differences. It shows what each side takes for granted and where the pictures diverge. | Shape Up helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow. It makes work boundaries and decisions explicit and captures results as pitches, bet-table decisions, and hill charts. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | Half day initial, dann laufend | 45-90 min | 6 Wochen Cycle + 2 Wochen Cool-Down |
Participantsdifferent | 2-6 | Ein Team plus Stakeholder | 3-12 | 2-4 pro Pitch |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Communication Plan, Channel Matrix, Message Cadence | Team API Document | Expectation Map, Alignment Notes, Agreements | Pitches, Bet-table decisions, Hill charts, Cooldown outcomes |
Tagsno overlap | CommunicationStakeholdersDeliveryPlanning | TeamAlignmentCommunicationService | AlignmentStakeholdersTeam | PlanningDeliveryAutonomy |