methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration showing three sorted card stacks and an open question about a possible group.
UX Research
Card Sorting
Paper illustration of a branching category tree with a highlighted search path and possible dead ends.
UX Research
Tree Testing
Paper illustration for Problem Interview
Product Discovery
Problem Interview
First-click Testing method illustration showing its working structure
UX Research
First-click Testing
Purposedifferent
When content only makes sense internally and users can't find the structure again, card sorting exposes their mental order. Terms, groups, and naming are then aligned with the target group's expectations.When a navigation exists but search paths still fail, tree testing checks findability without visual distraction. The method shows whether labels, levels, and paths really lead to the intended destination.When the picture of the problem still needs to become solid, it asks about real situations and consequences. It separates genuine suffering from mere interest in a solution.When users immediately turn the wrong way on a screen or wireframe, first click testing checks initial orientation at high speed. The first click shows early whether expectation, labeling, and wayfinding fit together.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumMediumLow
Timedifferent
20-45 min1-2 Tage30-60 min je Interview1-2 Tage
Participantsdifferent
Based on research questionBased on research question5-12 Interviews10-30
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncAsyncWorkshop + asyncAsync
Outputdifferent
Content groups, Label set, IA hypothesesFindability Metrics, Path Analysis, Revised IAProblem Evidence, Risk Notes, Customer SegmentsClick Heatmap, Success Rate, Design Recommendations
Tagsno overlap
Information architectureNavigationStructure
Information architectureNavigationFindability
DiscoveryInterviewsValidation
UXNavigationFindabilityValidation
Add more methods