methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration showing three sorted card stacks and an open question about a possible group.
UX Research
Card Sorting
Paper illustration of a branching category tree with a highlighted search path and possible dead ends.
UX Research
Tree Testing
Paper illustration for ABC Analysis
Operations
ABC Analysis
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method
Purposedifferent
When content only makes sense internally and users can't find the structure again, card sorting exposes their mental order. Terms, groups, and naming are then aligned with the target group's expectations.When a navigation exists but search paths still fail, tree testing checks findability without visual distraction. The method shows whether labels, levels, and paths really lead to the intended destination.With many similar objects of differing economic significance, the method prioritizes effort by effect. It separates what needs regular steering from what rarely needs attention.With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumLowLow
Timedifferent
20-45 min1-2 Tage30-60 min10-20 min daily
Participantsdifferent
Based on research questionBased on research question1-51
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncAsyncAsyncAsync
Outputdifferent
Content groups, Label set, IA hypothesesFindability Metrics, Path Analysis, Revised IAABC Classification, Focus Rules, Control ListDaily Plan, Time Estimates, Review Notes
Tagsno overlap
Information architectureNavigationStructure
Information architectureNavigationFindability
PrioritizationOperationsPortfolio
PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations
Add more methods