View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  UX Research Card Sorting |  Facilitation Stakeholder Mapping |  Delivery RAID Log |  Agile ROAM Board |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When content only makes sense internally and users can't find the structure again, card sorting exposes their mental order. Terms, groups, and naming are then aligned with the target group's expectations. | When an initiative depends on many people, interests, and power dynamics, Stakeholder Mapping systematically orders the environment. It shows who influences, who is affected, and where relationship management or safeguarding matters first. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 20-45 min | 60–90 min | 30 min Setup, dann laufend | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend |
Participantsdifferent | Based on research question | 2-8 | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone | 3-15 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Content groups, Label set, IA hypotheses | Stakeholder Map, Engagement Plan, Risk Notes | RAID Log, Status Report Source | ROAM Board, Owner List |
Tagsno overlap | Information architectureNavigationStructure | StakeholdersAlignmentFacilitationChange | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment |