methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration showing three sorted card stacks and an open question about a possible group.
UX Research
Card Sorting
Paper illustration of Leverage Points with its method-specific working model.
Systems Thinking
Leverage Points
Paper illustration of the McKinsey 7S Framework with seven connected fields
Business Strategy
McKinsey 7S
Paper illustration for Future Reality Tree.
Systems Thinking
Future Reality Tree
Purposedifferent
When content only makes sense internally and users can't find the structure again, card sorting exposes their mental order. Terms, groups, and naming are then aligned with the target group's expectations.Leverage Points show exactly where interventions in a system produce a disproportionate effect. It draws relationships, patterns, and feedback loops. The result is captured as a leverage map and action strategy.McKinsey 7S checks whether Strategy, Structure, Systems, Shared Values, Skills, Style, and Staff fit together. Organizational misalignments become visible across multiple levers as a result.A Future Reality Tree shows how desired actions are meant to lead to a better system state. The method checks whether a path of change holds together logically before time flows into implementation.
Complexitydifferent
LowHighMediumHigh
Timedifferent
20-45 minHalf day2-4 h2-4 h
Participantsdifferent
Based on research question3-123-123-8
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Content groups, Label set, IA hypothesesLeverage Map, Action Strategy7S Assessment, Alignment Gaps, Change ActionsFuture Reality Tree, Negative Branches, Assumption List, Improved Injections
Tagsno overlap
Information architectureNavigationStructure
Systems thinkingChangeStrategy
OrganizationStrategyAlignmentChange
Theory of ConstraintsSystems thinkingChange
Add more methods