View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() UX Research Card Sorting | ![]() Product Discovery Learning Card | ![]() Product Discovery Problem Interview | ![]() Product Discovery MVP Test Matrix |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When content only makes sense internally and users can't find the structure again, card sorting exposes their mental order. Terms, groups, and naming are then aligned with the target group's expectations. | The Learning Card connects traceable test results to a reasoned next action while keeping the limits of the insight visible. | When the picture of the problem still needs to become solid, it asks about real situations and consequences. It separates genuine suffering from mere interest in a solution. | When several minimal variants compete to answer the same question, it makes comparing and choosing between them cleaner. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a Test Matrix and a Test Plan. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 20-45 min | 25-40 min | 30-60 min je Interview | 45-75 min |
Participantsdifferent | Based on research question | 1-5 | 5-12 Interviews | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Content groups, Label set, IA hypotheses | Learning Card with evidence and next action | Problem Evidence, Risk Notes, Customer Segments | Test Matrix, Test Plan |
Tagsno overlap | Information architectureNavigationStructure | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryLearning | DiscoveryInterviewsValidation | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryOptions |



