View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() UX Research Card Sorting | ![]() Operations Kaizen Event | ![]() UX Research Tree Testing | ![]() Operations Gemba Walk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When content only makes sense internally and users can't find the structure again, card sorting exposes their mental order. Terms, groups, and naming are then aligned with the target group's expectations. | For a tightly scoped process segment with noticeable waste, the method bundles shared energy for change. It suits situations that call for fast learning loops and visible adjustments. | When a navigation exists but search paths still fail, tree testing checks findability without visual distraction. The method shows whether labels, levels, and paths really lead to the intended destination. | When there is uncertainty about the real course of a process, the method brings observation to the place where work happens. It combines perception, follow-up questions, and process knowledge so decisions rest on actual workflows instead of assumptions. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 20-45 min | 0.5-5 Tage | 1-2 Tage | 30-120 min |
Participantsdifferent | Based on research question | 4-10 | Based on research question | 2-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Content groups, Label set, IA hypotheses | Kaizen Charter, Waste List, Improvement Experiments, Standard Work Update | Findability Metrics, Path Analysis, Revised IA | Observation Notes, Improvement Ideas |
Tagsno overlap | Information architectureNavigationStructure | LeanContinuous improvementOperations | Information architectureNavigationFindability | LeanObservationProcessOperations |



