View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  UX Research Card Sorting |  Facilitation Dot Voting |  Facilitation Nominal Group Technique |  Facilitation Mind Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When content only makes sense internally and users can't find the structure again, card sorting exposes their mental order. Terms, groups, and naming are then aligned with the target group's expectations. | When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection. | When loud voices could dominate a round, Nominal Group Technique protects individual thinking time from group effects. It collects ideas separately first and only then enables shared weighting. | When a topic is still unclear and too many thoughts surface at once, Mind Mapping creates an open surface for ordering them. It makes connections, subtopics, and starting points visible without fixing them too early. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 20-45 min | 5-15 min | 60-120 min | 15-45 min |
Participantsdifferent | Based on research question | 3-20 | 5-12 | 1-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Content groups, Label set, IA hypotheses | Ranked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist | Ranked Ideas, Clarified Options, Group Priority | Mind Map, Topic Clusters, Open Questions |
Tagsno overlap | Information architectureNavigationStructure | FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization | FacilitationPrioritizationVotingInclusion | BrainstormingIdeasMappingStructureFacilitation |