methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
A paper-based illustration representing C4 Model with its core stages and visible working result.
Architecture
C4 Model
Paper fishbone diagram with a measurable effect at the head and six labeled cause branches.
Operations
Fishbone Diagram
Gemba Walk workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Operations
Gemba Walk
Paper illustration for Standard Work Analysis.
Operations
Standard Work Analysis
Purposedifferent
The C4 Model makes a system legible across several resolution levels, from context down to code. It suits situations where different audiences need to understand the same architecture from different altitudes.When a problem has several possible contributing factors, the method sorts causes by cause areas. It prevents an initial hunch from blocking the view of other plausible drivers.When there is uncertainty about the real course of a process, the method brings observation to the place where work happens. It combines perception, follow-up questions, and process knowledge so decisions rest on actual workflows instead of assumptions.When the same task is done differently depending on the person, the method exposes the reliable core. It creates comparability without unnecessarily choking off needed latitude.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowLowMedium
Timedifferent
1-4 h30-60 min30-120 min1-3 h
Participantsdifferent
1-52-82-62-6
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Context Diagram, Container Diagram, Component DiagramFishbone Diagram, Cause Categories, Investigation BacklogObservation Notes, Improvement IdeasStandard Work Sheet, Deviation List, Improved Standard, Training Needs
Tagsno overlap
ArchitectureCommunicationVisualization
Root causeQualityOperations
LeanObservationProcessOperations
LeanProcessQuality
Add more methods