View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Innovation Brainwriting | ![]() UX Research Card Sorting | ![]() UX Research Tree Testing | ![]() Facilitation Mind Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When loud voices or hierarchy distort the idea search, the method creates a quiet entry into joint development. It gives everyone thinking space and gathers contributions without social brakes, making diversity more visible and easier to build on. | When content only makes sense internally and users can't find the structure again, card sorting exposes their mental order. Terms, groups, and naming are then aligned with the target group's expectations. | When a navigation exists but search paths still fail, tree testing checks findability without visual distraction. The method shows whether labels, levels, and paths really lead to the intended destination. | When a topic is still unclear and too many thoughts surface at once, Mind Mapping creates an open surface for ordering them. It makes connections, subtopics, and starting points visible without fixing them too early. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 15-30 min | 20-45 min | 1-2 Tage | 15-45 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | Based on research question | Based on research question | 1-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Idea sheets, Expanded concepts, Prioritized list | Content groups, Label set, IA hypotheses | Findability Metrics, Path Analysis, Revised IA | Mind Map, Topic Clusters, Open Questions |
Tagsno overlap | BrainstormingCollaborationInclusionIdeas | Information architectureNavigationStructure | Information architectureNavigationFindability | BrainstormingIdeasMappingStructureFacilitation |



