methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Bottleneck Analysis.
Operations
Bottleneck Analysis
Independent contributions form an ordered group priority list.
Facilitation
Nominal Group Technique
Paper notes move from an inbox to action, project and calendar collections.
Operations
Getting Things Done
Paper illustration for Eat the Frog
Operations
Eat the Frog
Purposedifferent
For a flow that backs up at one point, the method looks for the capacity limit with the greatest leverage. It explains why extra effort elsewhere barely improves throughput.When loud voices could dominate a round, Nominal Group Technique protects individual thinking time from group effects. It collects ideas separately first and only then enables shared weighting.With many open commitments and ideas in daily life, a reliable external storage system emerges. The method relieves the mind so priority and context don't have to compete in memory.The method protects energy and attention for the task that creates the largest progress and is often postponed.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumMediumLow
Timedifferent
1-3 h60-120 min1-2 h Setup, laufend15-90 min daily
Participantsdifferent
3-85-1211
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopAsyncAsync
Outputdifferent
Bottleneck Map, Flow Metrics, Improvement Options, Follow-up MeasuresRanked Ideas, Clarified Options, Group PriorityAction Lists, Project List, Review RoutinePriority Task, Completion Note, Daily Focus
Tagsno overlap
FlowMeasurementConstraints
FacilitationPrioritizationVotingInclusion
ProductivityPlanningTasksExecution
PrioritizationProductivityFocusExecution
Add more methods